Until quite recently I hadn't been aware of much out there for men interested in feminism and gender equity. I suppose there are a lot of reasons for this: I'm most interested in things that are written for me (a woman), and I already have enough trouble keeping up with those things. And I suppose because I feel feminism is so embracing, I hadn't really thought it would be necessary for there to be a separate place for men. Although of course I can see how it might be alienating or even terrifying for a lot of men to spend time on a website called "bitch" with the tagline, "a feminist response to pop culture" (my personal favorite antidote to the patriarchy). Ok, I'm sold: To ensure that men are being reached, let's get excited about more accessible spaces.
It wasn't until I stared dating my boyfriend that I heard of The Good Men Project. I was immediately intrigued. What is the titular project? They want to talk about "men’s roles in modern life. We explore the world of men and manhood in a way that no media company ever has, tackling the issues and questions that are most relevant to men’s lives. We write about fatherhood, family, sex, ethics, war, gender, politics, sports, pornography, and aging. We shy away from nothing. Our content reflects the multidimensionality of men — we are alternatively funny and serious, provocative and thoughtful, earnest and light-hearted. We search far and wide for new stories and new voices from 'the front lines of modern manhood.' And we do it without moralizing and without caricaturizing our audience; we let guys be guys, but we do it while challenging confining cultural notions of what a 'real man' must be." Which sounds pretty awesome. Which is why it was it was a pretty big bummer when the founder of the project got into some unpleasant feminist bashing lately (tidily summarized here). It lead one of their frequent-contributor male authors to resign. Shortly thereafter, that same contributor was surrounded in a different controversy which caused him to decide to "withdraw from explicitly feminist spaces." It's a big controversy, and complicated. It's also clear to me that Hugo Schwyzer is an incredible and articulate feminist ally, and it's sad to me the way so many have resorted to name-calling. In sum: I am bummed out that The Good Men Project does not seem interested in committing to making space for feminism or treating feminism and feminists respectfully, and I am bummed that so many feminists would so fiercely turn on a male ally.
I remain firm in my belief that there is a place for men in feminism. In fact, I think it's really important that there is. Bitch media recently posted an awesome article about this that pretty much mirrors everything I'd want to say on the subject, but the short version is that feminism is for everybody because the patriarchy hurts everybody. Sure, it hurts some people a lot more than it hurts others; but it hurts everybody. What saddens me about all of the controversies above is that the willingness of people to turn on allies. There was a lot that went wrong here, but when a bridge is broken, you need to repair it, not burn it down. It is a bridge. It is the thing that connects you. We have to support each other. There's far too much worth uniting over to set out to destroy the people who are already on your side. Where is the go-to place for men in feminism now? I'm not sure.
I want to end by saying while most of the feedback I've been getting about this series (which ain't over yet, y'all!) has come from the ladies in my life (encouragement, questions, Facebook "like"s), I'm really, really happy that I've gotten some responses from my male friends, too. I mean, on the one hand, if you're friends with me, you kind of already know what you're in for. So I guess my final thought is a question: Fellas, what do you see is your role in feminism? And what do you think it could be? I invite your comments (ladies, too).
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
oh Margaret, I want to comment! I've tried to keep up with your prolific posting this month but haven't kept up so well. but this one did not slip through the cracks. and I want to discuss but I don't know where to start! Actually I do: discussion in person! But oh I'm so bad at that because I get distracted by the motes in the air and maybe the sounds of leaves on nearby things. And there's that little matter of that time in officeland i somehow got myself in the habit of attending. Ok, compromise: some here, some there...
ReplyDeleteOn the way home from work tonight I caught a bit of a piece on KQED about how brainstorming in a group of peers/colleagues/friends rarely works because people are afraid to offend, make enemies, or critique, and prefer patting on the back, instant enthusiasm, and sketches on a whiteboard. Yet research has shown for the past 50 years that the best and most successful ideas come from challenge and criticism; when people are in more hostile environs and have to defend their ideas, adapt them, pick apart others' ideas, compromise (or not), and innovate. So I think it's ok for people to be "terrified" or uncomfortable by something they don't understand, even important that it happen. Of course I think for "entry-level" discussion or awareness promotion or the like, that care has to be taken in presentation and framing of an idea or an ideal. But maybe after that point encouraging more contentious debate yet with yields to provisions of "you have the benefit of the doubt, I won't take offense; let's discuss on another occasion." I guess that got a bit abstract, but I think maybe some turns on some allies might be short-term growing pains.
As someone with a fair amount of feminist friends, I feel my role is to listen, answer if asked about specifics, and challenge to make sure actions are actually in line with beliefs. But as a person with all sorts of associations to society, I feel my role is to reach others with ideas that can be spread (and eventually implemented) that will benefit not just women, the under-represented, the needy, the poor, my family, Americans, or even humans for that matter, but beings in general. (There's that abstraction in action again, dammit!)
anyways, thanks for the welcome provocation for an open forum. i didn't intend to write this much but it's one of those things where i don't think i even really know even semi-concretely where i stand until i write it out. maybe some of my own ideals will sink in better after this outpouring :)